Telling truth helped by news coverage and podcasts
Special for my substack family; please spread links and help build subscriptions
Large Argentine newspaper La Prensa did major story on me and Pandemic Blunder; here is link and an English translation. No US newspaper has provided such coverage!
This is followed by a list of recent podcasts where I get pandemic truths out to the public.
Major article in Argentine newspaper La Prensa; interview with Joel S. Hirschhorn
https://www.laprensa.com.ar/509263-Covid-19-sigan-el-dinero.note.aspx
Here is English translation:
Covid-19: "follow the money"
Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn denounces that blocking early treatments at home was a deliberate strategy on the part of Anthony Fauci and other health agencies. "This is all about big pharmaceutical companies making billions of dollars," he says. With his book "Pandemic Blunder" he seeks to reveal the truth of the facts around the current situation.
By Agustina Sucri Novemer 21, 2021
Like other critics of the current COVID-19 "pandemic," there is no place in the mainstream U.S. media for Dr. Joel S. Hirschhorn or his book "Pandemic Blunder," in which he discusses how thousands of Americans died needlessly from this disease "because the government blocked early treatment and prevention at home."
However, the fact that they turned their backs on him in those spaces did not stop Hirschhorn. Since March 2020 he has not stopped researching, analyzing data and writing articles about the countless "mistakes" that were made in the management of the current health situation, published in the media that are now considered "alternative" for not bowing to the official discourse.
"The only logical explanation is that it's all about the old saying we have here: 'follow the money.' This is all about big pharmaceutical companies making billions, if not trillions of dollars," he said in an interview with La Prensa.
As a Doctor of Materials Engineering and a former senior lecturer at the University of Wisconsin, Hirschhorn has a long history in health issues. He was a senior official at the U.S. Congressional Office of Technology Assessment and the U.S. National Governors Association, where he led studies on health-related issues, including the risks of toxic waste dumps.
When in March 2020 he began to learn about doctors that in France and the United States they were curing seriously ill people from covid but governments did not pay attention to those successful clinical outcomes, Hirschhorn was surprised and began to suspect about what would be the true intentions behind this decision of the health agencies.
--What were your first impressions of COVID-19 and how public health institutions decided to handle it?
- Around March 2020 I was seeing data coming from France and then from New York, from Dr. Zelenko, and in both places they were curing the seriously ill for covid infection. At that time they were using hydroxychloroquine. It struck me that governments were not paying attention to these doctors – who seemed to know what they were doing, getting very good clinical results – first with hydroxychloroquine and, months later, with the other generic drug that Dr. Zelenko and many others in the United States began to use: ivermectin. We had a second cheap, generic drug with full FDA approval. Both drugs had been used for many decades by millions of people around the world for other reasons, but showing that they are safe, and were being clinically proven to be effective in managing covid-19 but the government was promoting another strategy. Dr. Fauci was willing to let hundreds of thousands of people die from covid infection because the government, the FDA, the CDC, the NIH, they weren't promoting any early treatment. And that's the key point: early treatment. So I saw a total failure in our government's response to this "pandemic."
--In fact, I recently read about what was the moment in history that changed everything: on March 11, 2020 when Fauci gave his testimony in front of the United States Congress, where there was a hearing, and there he claimed that this "new virus from China" would be very deadly and that it would be 10 times more deadly than seasonal flu. This is what he said in Congress and what the media picked up. So we had this ridiculous approach to the covid pandemic that was going to be terribly deadly. But if you look at data from the CDC and elsewhere, you realize that people under the age of 70 have very low risk of serious health problems, hospitalizations, or deaths from COVID-19. Under 70 years is not a very serious infection.
--The big mistake Fauci, our government and other governments, made was to think that there was only one alternative for the entire population. And the only logical explanation is that it's all about the old saying we have here "follow the money." This is all about big pharmaceutical companies making billions, if not trillions of dollars.
--Another of his criticisms of the management of this pandemic is that the current policy lacks recognition and support for the methods of personalized medicine. How could it be applied to improve the results obtained?
- Personalized medicine means that the medicine must be adapted to the patient. And doctors must have the freedom to treat their patients in the way they think is most appropriate for them, based on clinical history, genetics, biological formation... So personalized medicine is about medical freedom. Not for the government to say there is only one solution for everyone. Which is crazy. People's reaction to covid infection varies greatly. There are people who get very sick, if they are obese or have diabetes, or other conditions, or are very old and have a weakened immune system. So we need to have solutions that suit individuals. That's what personalized medicine is all about.
--You have said that there was a legitimate medical interest at the beginning of the pandemic to use personalized medicine. What happened next?
- Disappeared. I myself was surprised. I found references and appointments, and when I analyzed them, there was a legitimate medical interest in putting personalized medicine into practice for the pandemic. However, what happened next was this push towards another alternative, which Fauci designed, along with pressure from large pharmaceutical companies working around the world and eliminating personalized medicine and medical freedom. That is, the right of individuals to receive personalized treatments and the right of doctors to give their patients what they think works. Many doctors in the United States are using ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine and there is a new drug, fluvoxamine, which according to a recent study published in The Lancet, works.
- Therefore, you consider that the long list of mistakes that were made – obligation to stay at home, quarantines, masks and late treatment of covid – were intentional.
- Yes, they were the means for the government to control the people. This is what we call authoritarian, malignant actions by governments. And none of them work. When we looked at countless studies - in my book I quote one from Denmark on masks - it was known from the beginning that these measures were useless. I also wrote an article about the total number of people who have died in the United States due to the pandemic, close to two million people. Half, about 1 million, died as a result of collateral damage from quarantines, stay-at-home mandates, people who lost their jobs, people addicted, people who committed suicide. So this was intentional. Even today Fauci and our government still block the use of early treatments. It will be interesting to see if they also block the use of this new drug that Lancet has said actually works.
- Here in Argentina and in the world the media have been very enthusiastic about the new drugs from Pfizer and Merck.
- Yes, I don't know why. First of all, they will be very expensive. Our government, for the Merck pill, is paying $700. The number will also be very high for the Pfizer pill. I've been told by some experts that what Merck and Pfizer have done is play with the chemistry of ivermectin. Because they had to get patents on the "new" pill. An authority has told me that what they did with these pills were ingenious variations of ivermectin in order to obtain the patents. In fact, Merck is the manufacturer of ivermectin in the United States and probably in the world. So they knew early on how to play with the chemistry of ivermectin. I think Pfizer has done the same.
- Do you consider this to be a major case of corruption worldwide?
- Absolutely. The World Health Organization never did anything right and everyone follows what the United States does in terms of the CDC, the FDA, and the NIH. That's very sad. They are not thinking for themselves. They're not looking at these other countries like India or Indonesia, which have billions of people living in overcrowded conditions and already a lot of their population has acquired natural immunity. There many people were infected with the virus, it is inevitable. Most people, in the long run, will become infected with the virus. The point is that this way you get natural immunity, which is 27 times more effective than induced immunity, lasts longer, and is more effective against variants.
- Why do you think these far-fetched measures could be carried out?
--I call it a "collusion" or "conspiracy" between drug companies, government agencies and the mass media and the medical establishment. We must recognize that the official medical establishment, including the big medical journals, are all part of this as well. So it is very difficult to bring the truth to light. The real good information is good doctors – like Peter McCullough, George Fareed, Vladimir Zelenko – who are doing the right thing and are telling the truth, but how did that truth come to light? It's not coming out in the mainstream media, it's not coming out in the New York Times or the Washington Post, or the major news channels — ABC, NBC and CBS — it's coming out through podcasts. I have already done more than 60 podcasts on radio programs and every month I publish about three articles that are replicated in lots of alternative news websites but do not appear in the mass media. My book has not had any coverage by those media.
- What led you to write the book?
-- Although I wrote it almost a year ago, it is as current today as it was at that time. The only reason I wrote it was to educate people, to inform the public about the truth. And how the government, particularly Fauci, has ruined everything.
--Has the management of this pandemic undermined confidence in medicine and science?
- Oh, yes. Absolutely. I think now a lot of the public has lost confidence in medicine, in the medical establishment, and particularly in our government agencies: the CDC is nefarious, virtually no data from the CDC can be trusted. The best data comes from the UK, Israel, and a few other places in Europe. Therefore, people have lost confidence in the entire public health system. And that's why we still have so much resistance in America.
- Do you think that in this pandemic there have been big losers and winners?
--The losers are all the people who died from covid: more than 5 million worldwide. From my point of view, with a medical-scientific perspective, no one should die from covid-19 anymore. We know how to prevent deaths. The losers are also those people who suffer from the severe forms of infection and long covid, who survive the initial infection, but will have health problems for months or years in the future. Also those people who are suffering adverse effects and dying. I don't know who but the pharmaceutical companies, who are making money from all this, can be considered winners. Government agencies have failed. I am proud of India. India's largest state, with more than 240 million people, basically eradicated the pandemic by using ivermectin, it is giving it for free. There are also similar experiences in Latin America. Therefore, the winners are those countries that did not buy the official story. I would also call them winners, beyond the pharmaceutical companies that are winners because they made money.
- There are still many people who are frightened, afraid to take off their masks, making some wrong decisions for fear of the virus.
- That was Fauci's genius, who created fear. It was always about creating fear in the population. If the population is afraid of the virus, they will obey what the government says: they will wear masks, abide by lockdowns, stay home and do everything that proved ineffective. These measures do not really protect us. Fear is the tool of authoritarian governments and most governments, including the United States, have become terribly authoritarian. The pandemic will not end. It will continue because the virus will not be eradicated. It will always be around, one way or another. You must learn to live with it, and most people can live with it, they will not get sick in a mortal way. And to seniors who are at risk, we need to give them personalized medicine. In other words, we could have prevented all these deaths in nursing homes, but we didn't give these people any options. We didn't give them access to these generic drugs and they still don't have access to them today.
--So it depends on people getting out of fear at some point.
- As long as this kind of corruption exists in the mass media, I don't think the majority of the population will ever wake up. The only thing that will change this is to see more and more data on what are the alternatives that save lives and which only cause more disease and deaths.
PODCASTS [Just a few of the more than 60 podcasts and radio shows I have done.]
https://rumble.com/vpk4kk-covid-thanksgiving-2-we-can-do-this.-with-guest-joel-s.-hirschhorn.html
https://www.bitchute.com/video/m2rAVE3QI64Z/
https://rumble.com/vo1ntm-warning-do-not-get-vaccinated-if-you-are-in-this-group.html