Okay, can't recalculate because CDC didn't collect the data. However, the graph at the bottom does not support your point, so it would be better not to include it. There is plenty of data and graphs from England, Scotland, Israel that shows the uninjected have lower death rate than the injected. Also, you didn't include a very important point in the data fraud: Those who are injected are counted as uninjected for 14 days after injection. Thus death or hospitalization during those two weeks is counted as occurring to an uninjected person.
Thank you. So are you saying that when a person comes to the hospital their health record is checked, and the hospital assumes that record provides evidence of the person being vaccinated or not? And that hospitals rely exclusively on the record as a matter of course, possibly under the guidance of the CDC?
That is so unbearably stupid, I thought I should ask. Not that I wouldn't expect this from the CDC-hospital complex at this point.
Excellent post, thank you! One suggestion: analyze the manipulation in the example graph you show, provide an amended graph to show the real numbers. Presenting only that graph leaves the wrong impression!
Not possible to recalculate that data.
Okay, can't recalculate because CDC didn't collect the data. However, the graph at the bottom does not support your point, so it would be better not to include it. There is plenty of data and graphs from England, Scotland, Israel that shows the uninjected have lower death rate than the injected. Also, you didn't include a very important point in the data fraud: Those who are injected are counted as uninjected for 14 days after injection. Thus death or hospitalization during those two weeks is counted as occurring to an uninjected person.
The fraud has a purpose…
https://citizenfreepress.com/breaking/w-h-o-launches-global-vaccine-passport/
Another example: https://drflurmgooglybean.substack.com/p/seeking-kernels-of-truth?r=r6d2x&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
Thank you. So are you saying that when a person comes to the hospital their health record is checked, and the hospital assumes that record provides evidence of the person being vaccinated or not? And that hospitals rely exclusively on the record as a matter of course, possibly under the guidance of the CDC?
That is so unbearably stupid, I thought I should ask. Not that I wouldn't expect this from the CDC-hospital complex at this point.
Excellent post, thank you! One suggestion: analyze the manipulation in the example graph you show, provide an amended graph to show the real numbers. Presenting only that graph leaves the wrong impression!