Yes. As a self reported system it by definition cannot track ANY debilitating effects. The collection of fields CDC provides in vsafe are also mostly vague nothingburgers, focussed on predetermined, expected side effects like rashes or injection site pain… For something held up as the next generation tracking tool to replace VAERS, VAERS beats it (even with all its flaws) hands down.
One way they could make this data useful, is tying it to some external data sources. Each entry in this is associated an anonymized unique user ID. Presumably CDC has the de-anonymized ID of these people. It would likely only be a few FTE-days work, I’d expect, to use their known ID’s for each of these users to join in external hospitalization, fatality, and even VAERS reports. Then present publically using this same anonymization scheme.
I agree that the V-safe release was not revelatory wrt data on jabs harms, but the means by which it was released (two courts cases) revealed the CDC's strong effort to suppress even this small subset. Of course, the legacy media have suppressed the entire story, and the news bounced off the people who really needed to hear it.
Yes, we need a better collection data base. Kinda hard for very ill or dead people to report their condition.
Yes. As a self reported system it by definition cannot track ANY debilitating effects. The collection of fields CDC provides in vsafe are also mostly vague nothingburgers, focussed on predetermined, expected side effects like rashes or injection site pain… For something held up as the next generation tracking tool to replace VAERS, VAERS beats it (even with all its flaws) hands down.
Thanks for great comment.
One way they could make this data useful, is tying it to some external data sources. Each entry in this is associated an anonymized unique user ID. Presumably CDC has the de-anonymized ID of these people. It would likely only be a few FTE-days work, I’d expect, to use their known ID’s for each of these users to join in external hospitalization, fatality, and even VAERS reports. Then present publically using this same anonymization scheme.
I agree that the V-safe release was not revelatory wrt data on jabs harms, but the means by which it was released (two courts cases) revealed the CDC's strong effort to suppress even this small subset. Of course, the legacy media have suppressed the entire story, and the news bounced off the people who really needed to hear it.
Yes, we need a better collection data base. Kinda hard for very ill or dead people to report their condition.
Didn't Maddie de Garay's mother report to V-safe?