In the end it seems the initial programming so as open to flaws as Bill Gates Microsoft, although at this point I would be willing to consider the possibility that Gates IS an AI... The real issue with AI is who it then learns and who checks that learning. Just as with MSM and tack checkers, left unchecked they will wreak havoc, as they already have. They are equally culpable for excess deaths both during and post the false pandemic. But it is up to ordinary people to stop this and wake up to what is real and what is not real. For example: the pandemic was not real; climate alarmism is not real (the alarmism is but not the actual threat); gender identity is not real; white privileged is not real; the statement that Covid vaccines are safe and effective is not real; the statement that ivermectin and hydroxy chloroquine are not safe is not real. But you don’t need to worry about AIs for this, unless Gates is an AI of course...
Sounds like this particular AI was programmed by Neil Ferguson from Imperial College London...
A simple probability problem that any smart 12 year old can work out.
In the end it seems the initial programming so as open to flaws as Bill Gates Microsoft, although at this point I would be willing to consider the possibility that Gates IS an AI... The real issue with AI is who it then learns and who checks that learning. Just as with MSM and tack checkers, left unchecked they will wreak havoc, as they already have. They are equally culpable for excess deaths both during and post the false pandemic. But it is up to ordinary people to stop this and wake up to what is real and what is not real. For example: the pandemic was not real; climate alarmism is not real (the alarmism is but not the actual threat); gender identity is not real; white privileged is not real; the statement that Covid vaccines are safe and effective is not real; the statement that ivermectin and hydroxy chloroquine are not safe is not real. But you don’t need to worry about AIs for this, unless Gates is an AI of course...