It’s funny, I seemed to know all that without doing a study... just some old fashioned reading and common sense application and a bit of, “oh look the most compliant countries don’t have a better result”, you know, data!
A comparison of facemask and respirator filtration test methods
Samy Rengasamy,a Ronald Shaffer,a Brandon Williams,b and Sarah Smitb
"filtration efficiencies of “N95 FFRs” including six N95 FFR models and three surgical N95 FFR models, and three SM models were measured using the NIOSH NaCl aerosol test method, and FDA required particulate filtration efficiency (PFE) and bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) methods, and viral filtration efficiency (VFE) method"
"Results showed that the efficiencies measured by the NIOSH NaCl method for “N95 FFRs” were from 98.15–99.68% compared to 99.74–99.99% for PFE, 99.62–99.9% for BFE, and 99.8–99.9% for VFE methods."
2) the real time mask testing on a real person truth. he puts the mask on ,simply adjusts and tests
"Aaron Collins real time mask testing videos on you tube allow those who chose to see the Truth to see Aaron Collins put on a N95 "real category" mask and watch the reduction in the range above 99% of the inhalation of salt test particles ~64 nanometers in diameter . from wicked-o-pedia "Each SARS-CoV-2 virion is 60–140 nanometres (2.4×10−6–5.5×10−6 in) in diameter;"
for instance - on a mask I bought at home depot. test # 644 8/8/22 3M 9205+ Aura[Lot A220769] N95, Boat, As Worn, White, Headband, 21,820 particles per cc outside the mask at the start of the test 21,720 particles per cc outside the mask at the end of the test, 70 particles per cc inside the mask for a 99.68% reduction. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-nvaA67wXw Data can be found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/ "
3) the real world British hospital system truth showing the effectiveness of real masks, worn by real people, in an environment with real cov2 virus.
"Study author, Chris Illingworth from the MRC Biostatistics Unit at the University of Cambridge, said, “Before the face masks were upgraded, the majority of infections among healthcare workers on the covid-19 wards were likely because of direct exposure to patients with covid-19. Once FFP3 respirators were introduced, the number of cases attributed to exposure on covid-19 wards dropped dramatically—in fact, our model suggests that FFP3 respirators may have cut ward based infection to zero.”
Please note; " FFP3 respirators may have cut ward based infection to zero.”
"Taken together, these results suggest that the majority of cases among HCWs on green wards were caused by community-acquired infection, whereas cases among HCWs on red wards were caused by both community-acquired infection and direct, ward-based infection from patients with COVID-19, effectively mitigated by the use of FFP3 respirators."
Please note; " effectively mitigated by the use of FFP3 respirators."
also note; there are "REAL" respirator grade masks and low grade "bogus" masks. FFP3 is a european standard, it is in the N95 and better catagory of "real" respirator grade masks.
previously when I sent you links you stated " Show me the randomized trials on N95 masks in real world situations"
"Steve Kirsch Dec 17 Show me the randomized trials on N95 masks in real world situations. We have them for cloth and surgical masks. I also have data from multiple sources that N95's end up being very marginally effective, but too low to measure accurately."
"randomized trials" do not provide all the Truth. Adding the right Truth to the right Truth to the right Truth is what we have now.
As "required" I have now "knocked on your door" 3 times. "You have access to the Truth"
Yours Truly, James Allen Kringlee 1/16/23
Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Sunday Afternoon Mask Testing
It’s funny, I seemed to know all that without doing a study... just some old fashioned reading and common sense application and a bit of, “oh look the most compliant countries don’t have a better result”, you know, data!
In my book Pandemic Blunder written in 2020 and published in Jan.2021 gave results of Danish study showing masks ineffective.
1) "scientific" N95 Truth
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7157953/
A comparison of facemask and respirator filtration test methods
Samy Rengasamy,a Ronald Shaffer,a Brandon Williams,b and Sarah Smitb
"filtration efficiencies of “N95 FFRs” including six N95 FFR models and three surgical N95 FFR models, and three SM models were measured using the NIOSH NaCl aerosol test method, and FDA required particulate filtration efficiency (PFE) and bacterial filtration efficiency (BFE) methods, and viral filtration efficiency (VFE) method"
"Results showed that the efficiencies measured by the NIOSH NaCl method for “N95 FFRs” were from 98.15–99.68% compared to 99.74–99.99% for PFE, 99.62–99.9% for BFE, and 99.8–99.9% for VFE methods."
Please note; "99.8–99.9% for VFE" " viral filtration efficiency (VFE) method"
2) the real time mask testing on a real person truth. he puts the mask on ,simply adjusts and tests
"Aaron Collins real time mask testing videos on you tube allow those who chose to see the Truth to see Aaron Collins put on a N95 "real category" mask and watch the reduction in the range above 99% of the inhalation of salt test particles ~64 nanometers in diameter . from wicked-o-pedia "Each SARS-CoV-2 virion is 60–140 nanometres (2.4×10−6–5.5×10−6 in) in diameter;"
for instance - on a mask I bought at home depot. test # 644 8/8/22 3M 9205+ Aura[Lot A220769] N95, Boat, As Worn, White, Headband, 21,820 particles per cc outside the mask at the start of the test 21,720 particles per cc outside the mask at the end of the test, 70 particles per cc inside the mask for a 99.68% reduction. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y-nvaA67wXw Data can be found here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/ "
3) the real world British hospital system truth showing the effectiveness of real masks, worn by real people, in an environment with real cov2 virus.
https://www.bmj.com/content/373/bmj.n1663
Covid-19: Upgrading to FFP3 respirators cuts infection risk, research finds
BMJ 2021; 373 doi: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n1663 (Published 29 June 2021) Cite this as: BMJ 2021;373:n1663
"Study author, Chris Illingworth from the MRC Biostatistics Unit at the University of Cambridge, said, “Before the face masks were upgraded, the majority of infections among healthcare workers on the covid-19 wards were likely because of direct exposure to patients with covid-19. Once FFP3 respirators were introduced, the number of cases attributed to exposure on covid-19 wards dropped dramatically—in fact, our model suggests that FFP3 respirators may have cut ward based infection to zero.”
Please note; " FFP3 respirators may have cut ward based infection to zero.”
https://www.authorea.com/users/421653/articles/527590-ffp3-respirators-protect-healthcare-workers-against-infection-with-sars-cov-2
"Taken together, these results suggest that the majority of cases among HCWs on green wards were caused by community-acquired infection, whereas cases among HCWs on red wards were caused by both community-acquired infection and direct, ward-based infection from patients with COVID-19, effectively mitigated by the use of FFP3 respirators."
Please note; " effectively mitigated by the use of FFP3 respirators."
also note; there are "REAL" respirator grade masks and low grade "bogus" masks. FFP3 is a european standard, it is in the N95 and better catagory of "real" respirator grade masks.
previously when I sent you links you stated " Show me the randomized trials on N95 masks in real world situations"
"Steve Kirsch Dec 17 Show me the randomized trials on N95 masks in real world situations. We have them for cloth and surgical masks. I also have data from multiple sources that N95's end up being very marginally effective, but too low to measure accurately."
"randomized trials" do not provide all the Truth. Adding the right Truth to the right Truth to the right Truth is what we have now.
As "required" I have now "knocked on your door" 3 times. "You have access to the Truth"
Yours Truly, James Allen Kringlee 1/16/23
Attachments area
Preview YouTube video Sunday Afternoon Mask Testing