Unfortunately, now the authors want to disavow their own research:
Jose Gonzales Zamora
@JoseGonzalesZa1
Replying to @PierreKory
I am ONE of the authors of the study. This "retrospective" study looks for ASSOCIATION, not causality. Now that we have randomized clinical trials, we can say with certainty that IVERMECTIN DOES NOT WORK AT ALL FOR COVID. I recommend to read the conclusions of the abstract.
Unfortunately it appears this study was a ruse to make ivermectin proponents look bad. The abstract was not peer-reviewed and has been redacted and denounced by it's own authors. Yet still remains in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, with no mention of it being redacted. Shady behavior by both the journal and the authors I'm afraid.
Unfortunately, now the authors want to disavow their own research:
Jose Gonzales Zamora
@JoseGonzalesZa1
Replying to @PierreKory
I am ONE of the authors of the study. This "retrospective" study looks for ASSOCIATION, not causality. Now that we have randomized clinical trials, we can say with certainty that IVERMECTIN DOES NOT WORK AT ALL FOR COVID. I recommend to read the conclusions of the abstract.
1:22 PM · Mar 3, 2022·Twitter Web App
460 Retweets 168 Quote Tweets 2,366 Likes
https://twitter.com/josegonzalesza1/status/1499450061025157120?s=12
It’s clear someone “got to them”.
Robert Clark
Unfortunately it appears this study was a ruse to make ivermectin proponents look bad. The abstract was not peer-reviewed and has been redacted and denounced by it's own authors. Yet still remains in the International Journal of Infectious Diseases, with no mention of it being redacted. Shady behavior by both the journal and the authors I'm afraid.