Will Jones of The Daily Sceptic asked me to summarize all of my “early spread” evidence in one document, creating categories for “cases,” likely dates of infection, “sources” for these claims and include my estimate of how convincing this evidence is (strong, moderate, weak, etc). He also asked me to include “notes” on these cases.
It’s my “notes” that made this document quite long (5,450 words!) so this is definitely only for readers or researchers with a great interest in this topic. Still, Will’s suggested project was a good one as I have now produced a document that provides all of this data in one place and maybe some researchers or journalists with more resources or talent than myself will stumble upon this document in the future.
A few highlights:
The document identifies at least 130 Americans from 16 states who had antibody evidence of infection in 2019. Given that we don’t know the unknown people who infected these people, one could double this number.
Per my research, there have been “antibody-positive” early cases reported in at least five countries.
I point out that the real number of likely “early cases” is unknown as officials have not released information on the number of “early cases” these agencies received via antibody results reported to their agencies by clinics performing such tests.
I argue that results of published antibody test likely undercount the number of prior infections.
In my summary, I include the likely early case of John Perry, a man who became infected in North Carolina in early January 2020. Mr. Perry’s likely case is significant because he reports that he was contacted by public health officials from South Carolina and North Carolina, who asked him questions about details of his case. Mr. Perry anecdote strongly suggest that at least some public health agencies WERE investigating early cases, which they have never reported to the public. I find it hard to believe the CDC was not aware of his case and others.
I appreciate anyone who might pass along the link to this article to officials or journalists who might be interested in this topic.
pHARMa needs to be broken up and drug ads removed from the media, and citizens united needs to be repealed , for starters
Time to reverse the script and press misinformation charges against the medical perpe-traitors!
Will Jones of The Daily Sceptic asked me to summarize all of my “early spread” evidence in one document, creating categories for “cases,” likely dates of infection, “sources” for these claims and include my estimate of how convincing this evidence is (strong, moderate, weak, etc). He also asked me to include “notes” on these cases.
It’s my “notes” that made this document quite long (5,450 words!) so this is definitely only for readers or researchers with a great interest in this topic. Still, Will’s suggested project was a good one as I have now produced a document that provides all of this data in one place and maybe some researchers or journalists with more resources or talent than myself will stumble upon this document in the future.
A few highlights:
The document identifies at least 130 Americans from 16 states who had antibody evidence of infection in 2019. Given that we don’t know the unknown people who infected these people, one could double this number.
Per my research, there have been “antibody-positive” early cases reported in at least five countries.
I point out that the real number of likely “early cases” is unknown as officials have not released information on the number of “early cases” these agencies received via antibody results reported to their agencies by clinics performing such tests.
I argue that results of published antibody test likely undercount the number of prior infections.
In my summary, I include the likely early case of John Perry, a man who became infected in North Carolina in early January 2020. Mr. Perry’s likely case is significant because he reports that he was contacted by public health officials from South Carolina and North Carolina, who asked him questions about details of his case. Mr. Perry anecdote strongly suggest that at least some public health agencies WERE investigating early cases, which they have never reported to the public. I find it hard to believe the CDC was not aware of his case and others.
I appreciate anyone who might pass along the link to this article to officials or journalists who might be interested in this topic.
https://billricejr.substack.com/p/early-spread-evidence-in-one-document