I proved all three vaccines used in the US have negative efficacy. I used their own FDA submissions published in the NEJM, and used the correct endpoint for all morbidity and mortality. The results are appalling! Using grade 3 and 4 plus deaths as the endpoint Moderna's efficacy is -322.59%, 1 harmed for every 5 vaccinated. Pfizer efficacy -52.38% with 1 harmed for every 241 vaccines administered. J&J efficacy -80.32% with 1 harmed for every 74 vaccines administered. This analysis was done October, 2021.
I recall that the released Pfizer documents revealed investigator bias.
The participants in the vaccinated group who exhibited covid-like symptoms were simply not tested for covid and dismissed as non-covid illness, thus reducing the case count among the vaccinated.
Also vaccination status in the official medical records is not always accurate. They are biased to record the infected as "unvaxxed" if they are somewhere in the process of being vaccinated, or if there vaccination status is unknown. So the calculations could be based on inaccurate data to begin with! Garbage In, Garbage Out!!
Very good point!! I searched the full text and confirmed exactly what you said to be true!! They are providing the evidence that the triple vaxxed are at more risk of infection after 5 months, while not ever acknowledging it in the abstract.
And I also noted that the study was funded by Moderna, and the investigators had strong financial ties with Pfizer, GSK, and Gilead as well. So it is highly likely their numbers have been slanted in favor of these large corporate interests. The true "efficacy" is more likely much worse!
I proved all three vaccines used in the US have negative efficacy. I used their own FDA submissions published in the NEJM, and used the correct endpoint for all morbidity and mortality. The results are appalling! Using grade 3 and 4 plus deaths as the endpoint Moderna's efficacy is -322.59%, 1 harmed for every 5 vaccinated. Pfizer efficacy -52.38% with 1 harmed for every 241 vaccines administered. J&J efficacy -80.32% with 1 harmed for every 74 vaccines administered. This analysis was done October, 2021.
I recall that the released Pfizer documents revealed investigator bias.
The participants in the vaccinated group who exhibited covid-like symptoms were simply not tested for covid and dismissed as non-covid illness, thus reducing the case count among the vaccinated.
Also vaccination status in the official medical records is not always accurate. They are biased to record the infected as "unvaxxed" if they are somewhere in the process of being vaccinated, or if there vaccination status is unknown. So the calculations could be based on inaccurate data to begin with! Garbage In, Garbage Out!!
Very good point!! I searched the full text and confirmed exactly what you said to be true!! They are providing the evidence that the triple vaxxed are at more risk of infection after 5 months, while not ever acknowledging it in the abstract.
And I also noted that the study was funded by Moderna, and the investigators had strong financial ties with Pfizer, GSK, and Gilead as well. So it is highly likely their numbers have been slanted in favor of these large corporate interests. The true "efficacy" is more likely much worse!
You mean “efficacy” not “efficiency”.