We really need these figures broken down by age-group. The fact that older people were quasi-vaccinated more than younger people, especially children, is a good explanation for greater all-cause mortality in those who are quasi-vaccinated.
Even with all cause mortality statistics for a narrow age group, we would also want to know things we probably can't find out about the correlations between the fact that the person was vaccinated and various health status, behavioural, etc. variables which affect all-cause mortality. This is not an RCT - randomised controlled trial - in which randomisation is intended to create no on-average differences between the treatment and placebo groups other than that one group got the treatment.
I am not arguing against critiques of these quasi-vaccines of of Novavax COVID-19 vaccine. Quite the contrary - I argue they are a central part of the cluster of crimes against humanity which constitute the greatest crime against humanity since the Holocaust: https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/the-covid-19-pandemic-response-killed .
I am just arguing that these figures, on their own, do not establish a case that the quasi-vaccines increase all-cause mortality.
"The ONS mid-2020 population estimate of adults aged 18 or older in England is 44.5m. In contrast, NIMS has 49.7m adults aged 18 or older. Using NIMS rather than ONS produces an unvaccinated population estimate that is over 2 times higher (10.1m vs 4.9m) if we consider vaccination status as at 18 September 2021."
There's some kind of critique of what you wrote at: https://mobile.twitter.com/sinichol/status/1629906415329460226 but this is in the middle of another thread and again the text is too terse and unclear for me to to be bothered spending an hour or so trying to figure out what it means.
A great deal of effort is spent on debating vaccine this, lockdown that, mask the other. The fundamental thing which is more important than any of this is that if everyone supplemented vitamin D3 properly, their 25-hydroxyvitamin D level would be 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L or more (that is 2 to 10 times higher than most people's level today. Then there would be no COVID-19 or influenza pandemics, very little sepis, only a very few people being seriously harmed or killed by any of these three, and a great improvement in overall health. Most health professionals can't imagine that this could be true. They should read the research: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .
I love a good graph! These really show the story so quickly and clearly.
We really need these figures broken down by age-group. The fact that older people were quasi-vaccinated more than younger people, especially children, is a good explanation for greater all-cause mortality in those who are quasi-vaccinated.
Even with all cause mortality statistics for a narrow age group, we would also want to know things we probably can't find out about the correlations between the fact that the person was vaccinated and various health status, behavioural, etc. variables which affect all-cause mortality. This is not an RCT - randomised controlled trial - in which randomisation is intended to create no on-average differences between the treatment and placebo groups other than that one group got the treatment.
I am not arguing against critiques of these quasi-vaccines of of Novavax COVID-19 vaccine. Quite the contrary - I argue they are a central part of the cluster of crimes against humanity which constitute the greatest crime against humanity since the Holocaust: https://nutritionmatters.substack.com/p/the-covid-19-pandemic-response-killed .
I am just arguing that these figures, on their own, do not establish a case that the quasi-vaccines increase all-cause mortality.
https://mobile.twitter.com/TheRustler83/status/1629864457043169281
With NIMS population
Joel Smalley did one for age vaxed vs deaths ratio with NIMS population
I did the all cause per age with ons sole numbers and it’s just shows boosters for a while help but 1-2 doses are horrible for most age groups
I find Twitter a poor format for presenting and discussing anything complex. I am not sure what "ever vaccinated" means. Also, as you note, the number of people never quasi-vaccinated is easily underestimated, as was stated at: https://covidactuaries.org/2021/10/27/vaccine-effectiveness-and-population-estimates/ :
"The ONS mid-2020 population estimate of adults aged 18 or older in England is 44.5m. In contrast, NIMS has 49.7m adults aged 18 or older. Using NIMS rather than ONS produces an unvaccinated population estimate that is over 2 times higher (10.1m vs 4.9m) if we consider vaccination status as at 18 September 2021."
There's some kind of critique of what you wrote at: https://mobile.twitter.com/sinichol/status/1629906415329460226 but this is in the middle of another thread and again the text is too terse and unclear for me to to be bothered spending an hour or so trying to figure out what it means.
A great deal of effort is spent on debating vaccine this, lockdown that, mask the other. The fundamental thing which is more important than any of this is that if everyone supplemented vitamin D3 properly, their 25-hydroxyvitamin D level would be 50 ng/mL 125 nmol/L or more (that is 2 to 10 times higher than most people's level today. Then there would be no COVID-19 or influenza pandemics, very little sepis, only a very few people being seriously harmed or killed by any of these three, and a great improvement in overall health. Most health professionals can't imagine that this could be true. They should read the research: https://vitamindstopscovid.info/00-evi/ .